ONE'S RACIST THE OTHER ISN'T
The same of people who don't say a word when Democrats such as Cruz Bustamante and Sen. Robert "KKK" Byrd say "nigger" in public are getting their panties in a bunch over comments Rush Limbaugh made about Philadelphia quarterback Donovan McNabb. On ESPN's show "Sunday NFL Countdown" Limbaugh said of McNabb, "I don't think he's been that good from the get-go. I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team." I don't understand this crap. Where is the racism in that statement? Presidental candidate Wes Clark and Democratic Rep. Harold Ford Jr. of Tenn. have called for ESPN to fire Linbaugh. Yet they haven't called for Bustamante or Byrd to resign. Funny, isn't it. I used the word "nigger" for a reason, read below.
In yet another twisted view on racism, a judge in Washington state has ruled that the football team Washington Redskins could continue using the name. The judge said that there was no sufficant evidance to show that the word "Redskin" is a racist term. What the hell? The word "Redskin" is a diragatory word for and American Indian, just like the word "nigger" is a racist, diragatory word for blacks in this country.
Redskin Noun: offensive terms for Native Americans
This according to the dictionary. As a Cherokee I find this word, as well as this ruling, highly offensive and a slap in the face.
God Bless America
Categories:
Indian Affairs
CALL A PLUMBER
This has been the big news story for the past 2-3 days, so I have to post on it. Are there leaks in the White House? As you all know by now, former U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Joseph Wilson, has made the alligations that someone in the Bush White House leaked the info that his wife is a CIA weapons analyst. Wilson went out to talkshows accused top Bush political strategist Karl Rove of leaking the name to columnist Robert Novak, telling a Seattle audience last month that he wanted "to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs." However, on Monday Wilson told ABC's "Good Morning America" on that he got "carried away" and made up the Rove allegation out of thin air. Mr. Wilson says this all started because he spoke up against the Bush administation and it's handling of Iraq.
The columnist, Robert Novak, has stated many times that no one inside the Bush administation leaked the info to him. Novak should have known better than to print this info. Any smart person would. He's a Republican I'm sad to say, but he's a CNN Republican. That tells the whole story right there.
The Democats have gotten their panties all in a bunch over this. For some reason the liberal keep refering to her as a "covert agent" and "undercover agent". Shes not. She was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operative, and not in charge of undercover operatives. Some Dems have went so far as to say this is the greatest travisty they have ever seen. Yet they were silent when the Liberal Lord & Savoir Bill "Bubba" Clinton attempted to destroy one political opponent after another by illegally leaking damaging material to the media. Lets take a look at the Clinton offences.
- Paula Jones, whose tax returns were illegally leaked in Sept. 1997 to New York Daily News columnist Lar Erik Nelson. Nelson promptly detailed the material in his column, arguing that Jones deserved to be audited by the IRS because of the way she reported contributions to her defense fund.
Nelson, who has since died, insisted at the time that Jones' returns were given to him, not by the Clinton White House, but by one of her "friends". Some friend
- Then there was Linda Tripp, whose Pentagon personnel file was illegally leaked in 1998 by a Clinton Defense Department flak to New Yorker Magazine writer Jane Mayer, who promptly splashed details of Tripp's shoplifting arrest as a teenager across its pages.
The Clinton Justice Department investigated the charge, and came up, not surprisingly, completely empty. Democrat outrage over the obvious cover-up: Bubkiss.
- And where were our self-appointed guardians of privacy when the White House decided that the best way to discredit Clinton sexual assault accuser Kathleen Willey was to release her personal correspondence to the press.
U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth later ruled that the shabby manuever was a criminal violation of the Privacy Act. Democrats, however, stayed mum.
- And what about the mother of all White House privacy violations, Filegate. Over 1100 FBI files on Republicans were dispatched into the custody of bar bouncer-turned-White House security chief Craig Livingstone.
The request for the files came on memos from the office of then-White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum, a Hillary Clinton appointee. Nussbaum told FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene that Livingstone had been hired on Hillary's recommendation.
And according to Linda Tripp, the office of Mrs. Clinton's former law partner, William Kennedy, who served as Associate White House Counsel, was crammed with stacks of the illegally obtained files.
When President Clinton proclaimed that the largest invasion of privacy in White House history was merely "a bureaucratic snafu," Democrats agreed nearly unanimously.
Now let's get to the real daming offences. Newly declassified documents show that President Bill Clinton, in 1996, personally approved the transfer to China of advanced space technology that can be used for nuclear combat. To read the whole story, go to http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/29/25139.shtml
Some may say, "But Newsmax is a conservative biased site". You may see it that way, but I could make the same arrgument about the Clinton News Network. Just read it.
I would also like to say that all the info I got is from Newsmax.
God Bless America
This has been the big news story for the past 2-3 days, so I have to post on it. Are there leaks in the White House? As you all know by now, former U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Joseph Wilson, has made the alligations that someone in the Bush White House leaked the info that his wife is a CIA weapons analyst. Wilson went out to talkshows accused top Bush political strategist Karl Rove of leaking the name to columnist Robert Novak, telling a Seattle audience last month that he wanted "to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs." However, on Monday Wilson told ABC's "Good Morning America" on that he got "carried away" and made up the Rove allegation out of thin air. Mr. Wilson says this all started because he spoke up against the Bush administation and it's handling of Iraq.
The columnist, Robert Novak, has stated many times that no one inside the Bush administation leaked the info to him. Novak should have known better than to print this info. Any smart person would. He's a Republican I'm sad to say, but he's a CNN Republican. That tells the whole story right there.
The Democats have gotten their panties all in a bunch over this. For some reason the liberal keep refering to her as a "covert agent" and "undercover agent". Shes not. She was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operative, and not in charge of undercover operatives. Some Dems have went so far as to say this is the greatest travisty they have ever seen. Yet they were silent when the Liberal Lord & Savoir Bill "Bubba" Clinton attempted to destroy one political opponent after another by illegally leaking damaging material to the media. Lets take a look at the Clinton offences.
- Paula Jones, whose tax returns were illegally leaked in Sept. 1997 to New York Daily News columnist Lar Erik Nelson. Nelson promptly detailed the material in his column, arguing that Jones deserved to be audited by the IRS because of the way she reported contributions to her defense fund.
Nelson, who has since died, insisted at the time that Jones' returns were given to him, not by the Clinton White House, but by one of her "friends". Some friend
- Then there was Linda Tripp, whose Pentagon personnel file was illegally leaked in 1998 by a Clinton Defense Department flak to New Yorker Magazine writer Jane Mayer, who promptly splashed details of Tripp's shoplifting arrest as a teenager across its pages.
The Clinton Justice Department investigated the charge, and came up, not surprisingly, completely empty. Democrat outrage over the obvious cover-up: Bubkiss.
- And where were our self-appointed guardians of privacy when the White House decided that the best way to discredit Clinton sexual assault accuser Kathleen Willey was to release her personal correspondence to the press.
U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth later ruled that the shabby manuever was a criminal violation of the Privacy Act. Democrats, however, stayed mum.
- And what about the mother of all White House privacy violations, Filegate. Over 1100 FBI files on Republicans were dispatched into the custody of bar bouncer-turned-White House security chief Craig Livingstone.
The request for the files came on memos from the office of then-White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum, a Hillary Clinton appointee. Nussbaum told FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene that Livingstone had been hired on Hillary's recommendation.
And according to Linda Tripp, the office of Mrs. Clinton's former law partner, William Kennedy, who served as Associate White House Counsel, was crammed with stacks of the illegally obtained files.
When President Clinton proclaimed that the largest invasion of privacy in White House history was merely "a bureaucratic snafu," Democrats agreed nearly unanimously.
Now let's get to the real daming offences. Newly declassified documents show that President Bill Clinton, in 1996, personally approved the transfer to China of advanced space technology that can be used for nuclear combat. To read the whole story, go to http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/29/25139.shtml
Some may say, "But Newsmax is a conservative biased site". You may see it that way, but I could make the same arrgument about the Clinton News Network. Just read it.
I would also like to say that all the info I got is from Newsmax.
God Bless America
Categories:
Big Media,
Democrats/Liberals,
Iraq,
Republicans,
United Nations
MAKING MY POINT
A net buddy of mine and I have been having some good chats about different things. He's a real radical thinker. One of those "Looney Left". We both have our points to make, mine are better, but one of the best debated topics we have engaged in is religious persecution.
His Point - The religious right of this country have persecuted the non-religious
My Point - The non-religious have been trying for years to silence the religious
In a recent post of his blog, he said, "No, the REAL religious persecution comes when you (Your Average Fundy) wants to push your religion down MY throat. When you want to stick YOUR 10 Commandments into OUR court houses. When you want to shove your MISINTERPRETED religious beliefs in OUR public schools." I'm not a religious person, as I've stated before I'm an agnostic, but it's my understanding of Christian teachings that Christ said something to the effect of "Go forth and spread the word." That's what they’re trying to do. Now I don't agree with it 100%. We should leave people to worship, or not, as they see fit. But we can't tell people to NOT try and spread the word that they live their lives by and they believe in. That's trying to silence them. That's persecution. We all have the right in this great country to say what we want, within reason.
He doesn’t want the 10 Commandments in a federal courthouse. I can understand that's his choice, but to say flat-out "no" is as bad as the ones who want it displayed flat-out saying "yes" it will be displayed. Just because it's yours, or my, opinion doesn't make it the right one.
GM, or JW, I'm sure we'll get into a few more passionate discussions, like abortion and the death penalty, and I'm looking forward to it.
God Bless America
A net buddy of mine and I have been having some good chats about different things. He's a real radical thinker. One of those "Looney Left". We both have our points to make, mine are better, but one of the best debated topics we have engaged in is religious persecution.
His Point - The religious right of this country have persecuted the non-religious
My Point - The non-religious have been trying for years to silence the religious
In a recent post of his blog, he said, "No, the REAL religious persecution comes when you (Your Average Fundy) wants to push your religion down MY throat. When you want to stick YOUR 10 Commandments into OUR court houses. When you want to shove your MISINTERPRETED religious beliefs in OUR public schools." I'm not a religious person, as I've stated before I'm an agnostic, but it's my understanding of Christian teachings that Christ said something to the effect of "Go forth and spread the word." That's what they’re trying to do. Now I don't agree with it 100%. We should leave people to worship, or not, as they see fit. But we can't tell people to NOT try and spread the word that they live their lives by and they believe in. That's trying to silence them. That's persecution. We all have the right in this great country to say what we want, within reason.
He doesn’t want the 10 Commandments in a federal courthouse. I can understand that's his choice, but to say flat-out "no" is as bad as the ones who want it displayed flat-out saying "yes" it will be displayed. Just because it's yours, or my, opinion doesn't make it the right one.
GM, or JW, I'm sure we'll get into a few more passionate discussions, like abortion and the death penalty, and I'm looking forward to it.
God Bless America
DISRUPT MY DINNER AGAIN AND FEEL MY WRATH
Yesterday, President Bush signed into law the "Do Not Call List". About time. This list was setup to stop telemarketers from harrassing people at home. 50,000,000 Americans have signed up on the list. All was going fine until a liberal judge here in Oklahoma said, "NO". The the house and senate past legislation saying that it would go forward. And yet again another liberal judge in Colorado went against the American peoples wishes and said, "NO". And now President Bush has made it law. It's still being contested in court, but some telemarketer have said they'll honor the list. Good for them. Just leave me alone. I don't want any of the crap your trying to sell and I don't want to talk to you either.
God Bless America
Yesterday, President Bush signed into law the "Do Not Call List". About time. This list was setup to stop telemarketers from harrassing people at home. 50,000,000 Americans have signed up on the list. All was going fine until a liberal judge here in Oklahoma said, "NO". The the house and senate past legislation saying that it would go forward. And yet again another liberal judge in Colorado went against the American peoples wishes and said, "NO". And now President Bush has made it law. It's still being contested in court, but some telemarketer have said they'll honor the list. Good for them. Just leave me alone. I don't want any of the crap your trying to sell and I don't want to talk to you either.
God Bless America
Categories:
Democrats/Liberals
NOT A GUN BLAZING, DO OR DIE REPUBLICAN
Some here may be saying to themselves, Powerage, that's my internet name here, are you a die hard Republican? Do all of your view mesh with those of the stereotypical conservative. And my answer them is, "No". Not all my views are of the conservative variety, though most are. Some of the places were we differ are:
1. Guns - I hate guns. I think guns should be outlawed. The only people in the world that need guns are the police and military.
2. God - I'm an agnostic. I don't not believe in God or a God, it's just that I have some trouble excepting one.
3. Homosexuality - The stereotypical view of Republicans is that we hate gays. While it's true that some do, it's also true that some Democrats are homophobic as well. I don't care one way or the other. We're born loving who we love. We're not trained or brainwashed into it.
Those are the three big differences we have. I'm a registered Republican, but I consider myself an Independent Conservative. My views are my own, and I don't follow the trends set forth by other. This also goes for everything else. Fashion, music, movies and such. If it's popular, I more than likely hate it.
God Bless America
Some here may be saying to themselves, Powerage, that's my internet name here, are you a die hard Republican? Do all of your view mesh with those of the stereotypical conservative. And my answer them is, "No". Not all my views are of the conservative variety, though most are. Some of the places were we differ are:
1. Guns - I hate guns. I think guns should be outlawed. The only people in the world that need guns are the police and military.
2. God - I'm an agnostic. I don't not believe in God or a God, it's just that I have some trouble excepting one.
3. Homosexuality - The stereotypical view of Republicans is that we hate gays. While it's true that some do, it's also true that some Democrats are homophobic as well. I don't care one way or the other. We're born loving who we love. We're not trained or brainwashed into it.
Those are the three big differences we have. I'm a registered Republican, but I consider myself an Independent Conservative. My views are my own, and I don't follow the trends set forth by other. This also goes for everything else. Fashion, music, movies and such. If it's popular, I more than likely hate it.
God Bless America
Categories:
Republicans
CLARK SUPPORTS W
In 2001 Wes Clark (D) made a speach to Arkansas Republicans stating that, "I'm very glad we've got the great team in office, men like Colin Powell, Don Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Paul O'Neill - people I know very well - our president, George W. Bush. We need them there." Clark, in the past, has voted for Nixon and Reagan, then said that we need Bush in the White House. Make up your mind Wes. Are you a Democrat or Republican? The way your flip flopping on your views, you must be a Democrat. About Ronald Wilson Reagan, Clark has said, "We were really helped when President Ronald Reagan came in ... He was truly a great American leader. And those of us in the Armed Forces loved him, respected him and tremendously admired him." I can't agree more with you Wes. Ronald Reagan is, and forever will be, a great man. A man that did change his views as well. Looks like Clark took a cue from Reagan, but in the wrong direction.
God Bless America
In 2001 Wes Clark (D) made a speach to Arkansas Republicans stating that, "I'm very glad we've got the great team in office, men like Colin Powell, Don Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Paul O'Neill - people I know very well - our president, George W. Bush. We need them there." Clark, in the past, has voted for Nixon and Reagan, then said that we need Bush in the White House. Make up your mind Wes. Are you a Democrat or Republican? The way your flip flopping on your views, you must be a Democrat. About Ronald Wilson Reagan, Clark has said, "We were really helped when President Ronald Reagan came in ... He was truly a great American leader. And those of us in the Armed Forces loved him, respected him and tremendously admired him." I can't agree more with you Wes. Ronald Reagan is, and forever will be, a great man. A man that did change his views as well. Looks like Clark took a cue from Reagan, but in the wrong direction.
God Bless America
Categories:
Democrats/Liberals,
Republicans
"BUBBA" CLINTON WON THE WAR
Well according to Hillary.
Credit to Newsmax.com
Who deserves credit for America's military victory over Saddam Hussein's armies four months ago?
Why, the Clinton administration, of course – at least according to Hillary Clinton.
The former first lady made the bizarre assertion Wednesday morning during remarks at Washington, D.C.'s Godfrey Sperling breakfast.
According to the Washington Times, she based the claim on something Vice President Dick Cheney said during Desert Storm about wars being won with the prior administration's military.
By that measure, said then-Defense Secretary Cheney, he should have written a thank-you note to President Reagan after Gulf War I.
"I don't think [Cheney has] done that to my husband yet," Hillary said, adding, "I'd be happy to deliver it personally."
I knew the Clinton's were arrogant and conceded, but this is laughable. The man who effectively destroyed the military during his 8-year reign, and his wife thinks we should thank him. Dear God.
Other news that I haven't had the chance to report on.
Carol Moseley Braun announced that she in the race officially. Why? No offense to her, I'm sure she's a very nice and intelligent woman, but she hasn't a snowballs chance in hell of winning. Why waste the money? I don't know.
A California Gubernatorial debate took place last night. I don't think there was a real winner, but I do think two people lost it. Arrian Huffington and Cruz Bustamante. She was like a yapping dog the whole time. She was in attack mode against Arnold. Funny, when just a couple of months ago she was knocking over microphones and people just to try and get next to him for a photo. Bustamante pulled and Al Gore. He kept sighing and rolling his eyes everytime someone attacked him. That's a no-no Cruz, didn't you learn anything for Al two years ago?
And lastly, for Gohan.
LOOK INTO MY EYES. (.)(.) YOU WILL COME OVER TO THE DARK SIDE. LEAVE THE LIBERAL PARTY, GO CONSERVATIVE. ITS NOT ALL THAT BAD. I CAN HELP YOU FIND YOUR WAY.
God Bless America
Well according to Hillary.
Credit to Newsmax.com
Who deserves credit for America's military victory over Saddam Hussein's armies four months ago?
Why, the Clinton administration, of course – at least according to Hillary Clinton.
The former first lady made the bizarre assertion Wednesday morning during remarks at Washington, D.C.'s Godfrey Sperling breakfast.
According to the Washington Times, she based the claim on something Vice President Dick Cheney said during Desert Storm about wars being won with the prior administration's military.
By that measure, said then-Defense Secretary Cheney, he should have written a thank-you note to President Reagan after Gulf War I.
"I don't think [Cheney has] done that to my husband yet," Hillary said, adding, "I'd be happy to deliver it personally."
I knew the Clinton's were arrogant and conceded, but this is laughable. The man who effectively destroyed the military during his 8-year reign, and his wife thinks we should thank him. Dear God.
Other news that I haven't had the chance to report on.
Carol Moseley Braun announced that she in the race officially. Why? No offense to her, I'm sure she's a very nice and intelligent woman, but she hasn't a snowballs chance in hell of winning. Why waste the money? I don't know.
A California Gubernatorial debate took place last night. I don't think there was a real winner, but I do think two people lost it. Arrian Huffington and Cruz Bustamante. She was like a yapping dog the whole time. She was in attack mode against Arnold. Funny, when just a couple of months ago she was knocking over microphones and people just to try and get next to him for a photo. Bustamante pulled and Al Gore. He kept sighing and rolling his eyes everytime someone attacked him. That's a no-no Cruz, didn't you learn anything for Al two years ago?
And lastly, for Gohan.
LOOK INTO MY EYES. (.)(.) YOU WILL COME OVER TO THE DARK SIDE. LEAVE THE LIBERAL PARTY, GO CONSERVATIVE. ITS NOT ALL THAT BAD. I CAN HELP YOU FIND YOUR WAY.
God Bless America
Categories:
Democrats/Liberals
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
