Sen. Bill Clinton?

Some big name Dems in this country would love to see Hilary appoint her husband to finish out her term in the Senate should she win the presidential election next year. But aren't these the same people who, not too long ago, bitched at anyone who would listen that Bush was guilty of nepotism and cronyism? The same thing, but I'm still using both words. I'm a little confused on this. My side does it and it's okay, your side does it and it wrong. Would this be hypocrisy or business as usual in Washington? Maybe it's one and the same, I don't know.
Story

EDIT
Oops, sorry about that. I was totally reading that wrong. For some reason I read that that they want her to appoint Bill. Not so. I would have just deleted the post and left this but then some of you wouldn't know what I was talking about. Again, my bad.