EVIL & UNCARING
Cindy Sheehan has claimed that President Bush treated their meeting like a party, so why then did she pose for a picture with him giving her a kiss with her family around them? If he really did treat it like a party and wouldn't look at a picture of Casey or even say his name, why doesn't her family come out and back her up? They were there after all.
Thanks John.
The Only Thing Necessary For Evil To Triumph
Is For Good Men To Do Nothing
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Easy - she had a different opinion then. She was grieving, and the grieving often grab onto the closest comfort they can. Once they're past the pain they can often see that what they thought was help wasn't.
You've never experienced that?
Nope.
Why can't you just except that she's lying? Why would Bush treat this like a party while crying with another family? Why would he not even look at a picture of Casey while asking another family if he could keep the picture? She was against Bush and the war to begin with and now that she has a way to get her views out there she's hopped on for the ride. And pieces of shit like MoveOn and Moore have dug their claws into her and loving every minute of it.
Why can't you just accept that she's changed her opinion? Why wouldn't Bush treat a publicity stunt like a party? Why wouldn't he screw up the first time, and realise that he comes off as more sincere if he actually takes an interest the second time?
Grow up and smell the faeces Chris. Bush is about as socially inept as dog shit. Do you really want me to cite examples?
sheehan is a self admitted radical. she has no shame and uses her son's grave as a stump on which to further her own agenda. she clearly hates israel, america, and our military. she is nothing more than a fanatic and about as genuine as a ticking rolex.
Mr Unknown is a self-admitted moron. He has no shame and uses anyone and everyone as a stump on which to further his agenda. He clearly hates thinking, the rest of the world, and his own military. He is nothing more than a fanatic and about as genuine as a ticking rolex.
oh no more namecalling from the panzy ass. what is one to do.
again you expose your intellectual weakness. i have no agenda, i am no politician and i am not a libeal activist. if i didnt like thinking i would not waste my time w/ the likes of you. as a matter of fact there are many liberals i gladly call friend and they can hold an intelligent conversation w/ me w/o resorting to the childish nonsense you choose to lower the debate to. oh i am a fanatic? yeah that's the kettle calling the pot black.
Bullcrap you have no political agenda - if you didn't, you wouldn't argue.
And I'm only using the same tactics you've used.
i dont argue to change minds or benefit any politician. truth be told i think most politicians are fakes and i dont trust them. i argue b/c it strengthens my point of view when i can see challenges and i can do further research to determine a defense against any points that are made. it gives new perspective and is often times a learning experience for everyone. when we get down to the namecalling it loses that quality, so i think it best to agree to disagree for now and try to be more civil. i'd say you started it, you'd say i started it but neither of us really know aand it is silly to carry on w/ childish namecalling. truce.
I was wondering when you'd get around to that position. Your "you're an idiot" arguments do nothing other than strengthen your resentment of a side I don't even support.
Anywho to get back to Sheehan, I really have to quote Tom Tomorrow:
"Cindy Sheehan's son would not have wanted her to be such a traitorous America-hating @#&$%*!!
He would, however, have wanted us to denounce his mother as vitriolically as possible!"
whose to tomorrow?
Tom Tomorrow - the author of "This Modern World".
Post a Comment