Not only is she horse ass ugly, but Madeleine Albright is donkey ass dumb as well.
| "In an interview posted on the Democratic National Committee's web site, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright says she doesn't like the way President Bush 'repeatedly' talks about achieving victory in the Iraq war" |
11 comments:
No, she'd rather he talked like a realist - you haven't won a damn thing yet. "Losing" the war isn't the only other way of talking about it. It's only a "dumbass" who'd think that it was.
Dude, the war in Iraq is over. The objective was to go in and remove Saddam from power. That done, the war is over. What's going on now is essentially a clean up effort just like in Germany, Japan and Korea, that the Left around the world is hoping we lose. Everytime an American soldier is killed people like George Galloway get a smile on their face.
The war isn't over. The objective was to go in and remove Saddam from power without causing him to be replaced by another dangerous individual.
Not only are we currently fighting Saddam loyalists (making your point wrong anyway), we're also fighting people who wish to replace Saddam.
[sarcasm]And of course - the "Left" would love to see you lose, because they'd love to see the US cause yet another dictatorship.[/sarcasm]
No offense, but your ability to understand people is pathetic.
Read the comment I made about not caring to understand people.
So in other words, you WANT to be ignorant, you WANT to hate people, you WANT to be screwed over... and you make yourself out to be on the morally superior side?!
Do you have a victimisation complex a mile wide, or do you need medication to sustain that level of neurosis?
When the hell have I ever pretended to be morally superior to anyone? I'm not morally superior to anyone. If there's anyone here who that could be said about it's you with your smug ass comments on damn near every post. You sit on your high horse thinking you're better than everyone. And if that's no the case, then that's the way you make it seem.
You obviously don't know what "morally superior" means. It means you think your morals are always right. So when you say "this person should be shot" or "we need to kill these fuckers" you are saying that your superior morals should dictate the course of the day.
Get it?
Moral superiority does not mean superiority complex.
My morals aren't always right. Once again you read and believe what you want.
So you're now saying that when you say we should kill off anyone, that you are in fact wrong?
Or is there some special rule as to when your moral judgements are correct and when they're not?
Exactly what I'm talking about. You see and read what you want. I don't believe I'm morally superior to anyone. I don't believe my morals are always right. But I do believe that I'm right. Just as you believe that you are. I believe that the only way to stop a threat is with action, you believe it's through talking. You believe you're right. Does that make your morals superior to mine? No. Does it make mine superior to yours? No. You judge me without even knowing me.
Hardly me "reading what I want". You blatantly said "My morals aren't always right". If you can make that statement, then on some meta-level you can see that they go wrong in places.
Post a Comment