Wednesday, January 28, 2004
I had to post on this. Fmr. chief weapons inspector David Kay has said that Saddam didn't have WMD's. This has caused the grumblings of the left on the impeachment of Bush to get a little louder. But in all fairness, these grumblings have been around since he won in 2000. They want Bush impeached for "lying to the American people about WMD's". I was looking at some of the many sites dedicated to the subject, and many don't even list why they feel he should be impeached. I find that kind of funny. Another argument is they make is they want us to believe Bush said that Saddam was a threat. When he actually said that we need to stop him before be became a threat. If you ask me, this is nothing more than sour grapes. Their hero "Bubba" was impeached for lying to the American people, not to mention under oath, so now they want revenge. Kind of like Ed Asner and his quote about "we got Rush, next we get Hannity". If they want to go after someone for lying about Saddam and WMD's, they should go after "Bubba" and the U.N. as well. But I just don't see that happening.

To be honest, I don't care if Saddam had WMD's or not. He had to be taken out for the mass genocide he was commiting.

The Only Thing Necessary For Evil To Triumph
Is For Good Men To Do Nothing